Radeon RX 7600 vs Arc A350M
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Arc A350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 268.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A350M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+268.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-268.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Arc A350M
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Arc A350M's 4,500 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 268.5%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Arc A350M uses Generation 12.7, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 768 (Arc A350M). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1150 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 6 (Arc A350M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+268% | 4,500 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+1132% | 1.766 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+131% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.1 MB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+433% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A350M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A350M has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) vs 112 GB/s (Arc A350M) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4 MB (Arc A350M) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+157% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs Intel Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | Intel Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | Intel Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Arc A350M's 25W — a 147.4% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (Arc A350M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 25W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 180.0+79% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | DG2-128 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #118 | #418 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Arc A350M
