Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce GTS 250
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2814.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 250.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2814.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2814.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 133.1% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTS 250.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+133.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GTS 250
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the GeForce GTS 250's 569 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 2814.1%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTS 250 uses Fermi, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 250). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+2814% | 569 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+3517% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTS 250 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 250) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+10% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 250).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the GeForce GTS 250's 106W — a 43.5% difference. The GeForce GTS 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 450W (GeForce GTS 250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 106W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+1761% | 5.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce GTS 250 launched at $129 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTS 250 costs 92% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 28.4 (GeForce GTS 250) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 133.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $129-52% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $20-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+133% | 28.4 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GF106 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #118 | #791 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GTS 250
