
Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 120.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+120.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-120.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $77 versus $250 for the Radeon RX 7600, it costs 69% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 47.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($77) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 7,525 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 120.3%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+120% | 7,525 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+1426% | 1.425 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+700% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+50% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 6 (Volta) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 50W — a 107% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 50W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 150.5+50% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti launched at $150 and now averages $77. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti costs 69.2% less ($173 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 47.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $150-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $77-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3 | 97.7+47% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GK106 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | October 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #118 | #633 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














