Radeon RX 7600 vs Quadro CX
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Quadro CX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro CX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro CX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1650.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro CX.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1650.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1650.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $500 for the Quadro CX, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3401.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3401.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Quadro CX
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 1650.9%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+1651% | 947 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+4605% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro CX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+10% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 9.5% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 150W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+1495% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999 and now averages $500. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 50% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.9 (Quadro CX) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 3389.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-87% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-50% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+3389% | 1.9 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GT200B |
| Release | May 24 2023 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #118 | #901 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Quadro CX
