Radeon RX 7600 vs Radeon 660M
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Radeon 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 414.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 660M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+414.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-414.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon 660M
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Radeon 660M
The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Radeon 660M's 3,221 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 414.8%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1900 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 6 (Radeon 660M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+415% | 3,221 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+1391% | 1.459 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+40% | 1900 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+433% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 660M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 660M has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 122% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 40W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+25% | 80.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon 660M
