Radeon RX 7600 vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 35.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+35.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-35.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $340 for the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU, it costs 26% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 84% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+84%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($340) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU's 12,258 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 35.3%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+35% | 12,258 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584 ×2+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+102% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+77% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 224 ×2+75% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU's 300W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-45% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+146% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 costs 26.5% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 36.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 83.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-26% | $340 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+84% | 36.1 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #118 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
