Radeon RX 7600 vs Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro W5700.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro W5700, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 38.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 14,380 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 15.3%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+15% | 14,380 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+145% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+38% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 21.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-20% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+43% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 and now averages $300. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 47.9 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 38.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-66% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+38% | 47.9 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #118 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon Pro W5700
