Radeon RX 7600 vs Radeon PRO W6400
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 96.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6400.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+96.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-96.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $200), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 57.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon PRO W6400.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+57.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon PRO W6400
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 8,428 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 96.7%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+97% | 8,428 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+508% | 3.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+14% | 2331 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+167% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 107% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 50W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 168.6+68% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229 and now averages $200. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 20% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 42.1 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 57.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $229-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $200-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+57% | 42.1 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #118 | #308 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon PRO W6400
