Radeon RX 7600 vs Radeon R5 M240
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 M240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M240 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3405.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M240.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3405.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3405.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 320.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon R5 M240.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+320.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon R5 M240
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Radeon R5 M240's 473 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 3405.5%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+3405% | 473 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+540% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+4755% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+240% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+540% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R5 M240 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 has 512 MB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 138.5% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+536% | 15.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100 and now averages $30. The Radeon R5 M240 costs 88% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 15.8 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 319.6% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $100-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $30-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+320% | 15.8 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Oland |
| Release | May 24 2023 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #118 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon R5 M240
