Radeon RX 7600 vs RTX A4000H
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 40.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+40.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-40.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 420.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+420.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and RTX A4000H
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 40.3%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+40% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+13% | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+70% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 55.6% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s+56% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 16.4% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 140W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+19% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000 and now averages $927. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 73% less ($677 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.7 (RTX A4000H) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 422% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-73% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-73% | $927 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+422% | 12.7 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA104 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #118 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and RTX A4000H
