Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E3-1265L v4

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 3 1300X

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E3-1265L v4

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 1300X

4 / 4

6,923

0.0%

Athlon 300U

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1265L v4

4 / 8

6,954

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E3-1265L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $288 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Delivers 221.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1265L v4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1265L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,486 vs 4,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1265L v4, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1265L v4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1265L v4

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, while Ryzen 3 1300X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1265L v4 better than Ryzen 3 1300X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1265L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 1300X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1265L v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1265L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 29.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1265L v4 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1265L v4 comes in 223.3% more expensive on MSRP at $417 MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 1300X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,923 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 1300X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 1300X

The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

Xeon E3-1265L v4

The Xeon E3-1265L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,954 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 1300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1265L v4's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v4 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Xeon E3-1265L v4's 6,954 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v4. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,486 vs 4,500 (25.4% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v4). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,120 vs 900, a 21.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 1300X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,155 vs 3,000 (5% advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E3-1265L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+12%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+48%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Broadwell-DT (2015)
PassMark	6,923	6,954
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,486	4,500+29%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,120+24%	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,155+5%	3,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E3-1265L v4 — the Ryzen 3 1300X supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 3 1300X supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 3 1300X) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1265L v4) — the Ryzen 3 1300X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 1300X) and C226 (Xeon E3-1265L v4).

Feature	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E3-1265L v4
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+43%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+50%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 3 1300X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1265L v4). The Xeon E3-1265L v4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics P6300), while the Ryzen 3 1300X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v4 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E3-1265L v4
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 1300X was priced at $129, while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($129 vs $417), Ryzen 3 1300X was $288 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 1300X delivers 53.7 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v4 — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 105.2% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP	$129-69%	$417
Performance per Dollar	53.7+222%	16.7
Release Date	2017	2015

Search Ryzen 3 1300X on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1265L v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.