Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 1300X

Intel

Core i7-6700T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
Ryzen family
·······

Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 1300X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 1300X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 1300X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700T

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $174 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6700T.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,994).
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6700T better than Ryzen 3 1300X?
Yes. Core i7-6700T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-6700T is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-6700T comes in 134.9% more expensive on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 1300X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,923 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 1300X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 1300X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6700T

The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.

AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 1300X's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-6700T. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
6,994+1%
6,923
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,486
Geekbench 6 Single
1,120
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,155
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6700T) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700T was priced at $303, while the Ryzen 3 1300X came in at $129. On launch pricing ($303 vs $129), Ryzen 3 1300X was $174 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 53.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1300X — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 79.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
MSRP
$303
$129-57%
Performance per Dollar
23.1
53.7+132%
Release Date
2015
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.