
Core i7-6700T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 1300X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-6700T
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 1300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6700T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,994).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i7-6700T
2015Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6700T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 1300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,994).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Core i7-6700T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700T and Ryzen 3 1300X

Core i7-6700T
Core i7-6700T
The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.


Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6700T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 1300X's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-6700T. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,994+1% | 6,923 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,486 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,155 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6700T) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-6700T launched at $303 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 1300X debuted at $129. On MSRP ($303 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 1300X is $174 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 53.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1300X — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 79.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303 | $129-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 53.7+132% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













