Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 1300X

Intel

Core i7-6700T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-6700T

2015

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 1300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $174 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6700T.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,994).
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Core i7-6700T?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 3 1300X is ahead with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700T pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700T is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 1300X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 1300X is $174 cheaper on MSRP at $129 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i7-6700T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 132.5% better value on MSRP (53.7 vs 23.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 1300X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low167 FPS173 FPS
medium134 FPS156 FPS
high107 FPS127 FPS
ultra83 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS151 FPS
medium115 FPS124 FPS
high90 FPS98 FPS
ultra70 FPS75 FPS
4K
low66 FPS67 FPS
medium56 FPS59 FPS
high44 FPS46 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium147 FPS169 FPS
high136 FPS157 FPS
ultra102 FPS124 FPS
1440p
low148 FPS169 FPS
medium128 FPS145 FPS
high118 FPS133 FPS
ultra92 FPS110 FPS
4K
low116 FPS132 FPS
medium104 FPS117 FPS
high81 FPS96 FPS
ultra58 FPS72 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low175 FPS173 FPS
medium175 FPS173 FPS
high175 FPS173 FPS
ultra175 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low175 FPS173 FPS
medium175 FPS173 FPS
high175 FPS173 FPS
ultra175 FPS173 FPS
4K
low175 FPS173 FPS
medium175 FPS173 FPS
high175 FPS160 FPS
ultra175 FPS128 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low175 FPS173 FPS
medium175 FPS173 FPS
high175 FPS173 FPS
ultra175 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low175 FPS173 FPS
medium175 FPS173 FPS
high175 FPS173 FPS
ultra175 FPS173 FPS
4K
low175 FPS173 FPS
medium175 FPS173 FPS
high175 FPS173 FPS
ultra175 FPS173 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700T and Ryzen 3 1300X

Intel

Core i7-6700T

The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.

AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 1300X's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-6700T. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
6,994+1%
6,923
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,486
Geekbench 6 Single
1,120
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,155
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6700T) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-6700T launched at $303 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 1300X debuted at $129. On MSRP ($303 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 1300X is $174 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 53.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1300X — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 79.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6700TRyzen 3 1300X
MSRP
$303
$129-57%
Performance per Dollar
23.1
53.7+132%
Release Date
2015
2017