Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1505M v5

Intel

Core i7-6700T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1505M v5

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1505M v5 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1505M v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1505M v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700T

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,994 vs 6,995).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $115 MSRP).

Xeon E3-1505M v5

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $188 less on MSRP ($115 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
  • Delivers 163.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($115 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1505M v5 better than Core i7-6700T?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1505M v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1505M v5 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1505M v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E3-1505M v5 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1505M v5 comes in $188 cheaper on MSRP at $115 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 163.5% better value on MSRP (60.8 vs 23.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1505M v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1505M v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6700T

The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Xeon E3-1505M v5

The Xeon E3-1505M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,995 points. Launch price was $434.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6700T and Xeon E3-1505M v5 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v5 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1505M v5 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1505M v5 uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Xeon E3-1505M v5's 6,995 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E3-1505M v5. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-6700TXeon E3-1505M v5
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Skylake-H (2015−2016)
PassMark
6,994
6,995
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1505M v5 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700TXeon E3-1505M v5
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700T was priced at $303, while the Xeon E3-1505M v5 came in at $115. On launch pricing ($303 vs $115), Xeon E3-1505M v5 was $188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 60.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1505M v5 — making the Xeon E3-1505M v5 the 90% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6700TXeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP
$303
$115-62%
Performance per Dollar
23.1
60.8+163%
Release Date
2015
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.