
Core i7-6700T

Ryzen 3 3200G
Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 3200G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 3200G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-6700T
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,994 vs 6,999).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 70.0 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 203.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 70.0 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 8, while Core i7-6700T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 3200G better than Core i7-6700T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-6700T vs Ryzen 3 3200G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700T
The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.


Ryzen 3 3200G
The Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,999 points. Launch price was $99.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6700T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 3200G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200G — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200G uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Ryzen 3 3200G's 6,999 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 3200G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200G.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 6,994 | 6,999 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 12 |
Advanced Features
The Ryzen 3 3200G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i7-6700T requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Vega 8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-6700T was priced at $303, while the Ryzen 3 3200G came in at $100. On launch pricing ($303 vs $100), Ryzen 3 3200G was $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 70.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 3200G — making the Ryzen 3 3200G the 100.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303 | $100-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 70.0+203% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















