Core i7-6700T vs Core i7-6820EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700T vs Core i7-6820EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700T vs Core i7-6820EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700T

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,994 vs 7,025).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6820EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-6820EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Core i7-6700T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6700T better than Core i7-6820EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-6700T is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6820EQ pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6820EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6700T is the better buy right now. Core i7-6700T comes in $75 cheaper on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-6820EQ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 24.2% better value on MSRP (23.1 vs 18.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6820EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6700T vs Core i7-6820EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700T

The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.

Core i7-6820EQ

The Core i7-6820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6700T and Core i7-6820EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-6820EQ — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700T. Both are built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Core i7-6820EQ's 7,025 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-6820EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700T vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6820EQ.

Feature	Core i7-6700T	Core i7-6820EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+29%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	6,994	7,025

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6700T) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6820EQ). The Core i7-6820EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-6700T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6820EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-6700T	Core i7-6820EQ
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700T was priced at $303, while the Core i7-6820EQ came in at $378. On launch pricing ($303 vs $378), Core i7-6700T was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 18.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-6820EQ — making the Core i7-6700T the 21.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6700T	Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP	$303-20%	$378
Performance per Dollar	23.1+24%	18.6
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Core i7-6700T on Amazon

Search Core i7-6820EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.