
Core i7-6700T

Xeon E5-1620 v3
Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E5-1620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-6700T
2015Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1620 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- β3.1% HIGHER MSRP$303 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
Xeon E5-1620 v3
2014Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β Costs $9 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (6,959 vs 6,994).
- β300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6700T better than Xeon E5-1620 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700T
The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015β2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E5-1620 v3
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-6700T and Xeon E5-1620 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 β identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake (2015β2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014β2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 6,959 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-6700T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700T vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015β2016) | Haswell-EP (2014β2015) |
| PassMark | 6,994 | 6,959 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6700T) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-6700T was priced at $303, while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($303 vs $294), Xeon E5-1620 v3 was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v3 β making the Xeon E5-1620 v3 the 2.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700T | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303 | $294-3% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 23.7+3% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















