Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E5-2623 v4

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E5-2623 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 1300X

4 / 4

6,923

+0.8%

Athlon 300U

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2623 v4

4 / 8

6,868

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E5-2623 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E5-2623 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2623 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2623 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2623 v4, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2623 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2623 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,868 vs 6,923).
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Xeon E5-2623 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2623 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 1300X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 1300X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 1300X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 1300X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $129 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2623 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 1300X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E5-2623 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 1300X

The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

Xeon E5-2623 v4

The Xeon E5-2623 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,868 points. Launch price was $444.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 1300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2623 v4's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2623 v4 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2623 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Xeon E5-2623 v4's 6,868 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 1300X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2623 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E5-2623 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	6,923	6,868
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,486	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,120	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,155	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2623 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.