
Ryzen 3 2200G

Xeon E3-1275 v2
Ryzen 3 2200G vs Xeon E3-1275 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 2200G vs Xeon E3-1275 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 2200G vs Xeon E3-1275 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 2200G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $327 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 336.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.0 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 77W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1275 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1275 v2, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 20 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1275 v2 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Xeon E3-1275 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 20 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics P4000, while Ryzen 3 2200G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,644 vs 6,736).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 68.0 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 77W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 2200G better than Xeon E3-1275 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 2200G vs Xeon E3-1275 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 2200G
The Ryzen 3 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,736 points. Launch price was $99.

Xeon E3-1275 v2
The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,644 points. Launch price was $808.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 2200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1275 v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200G versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275 v2 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1275 v2 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 2200G uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1275 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 2200G scores 6,736 against the Xeon E3-1275 v2's 6,644 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 2200G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2200G vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1275 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2200G | Xeon E3-1275 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,736+1% | 6,644 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 2200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1275 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2200G | Xeon E3-1275 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32.77 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 2200G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1275 v2). The Xeon E3-1275 v2 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics P4000), while the Ryzen 3 2200G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1275 v2 targets Server/Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2200G | Xeon E3-1275 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server/Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 2200G was priced at $99, while the Xeon E3-1275 v2 came in at $426. On launch pricing ($99 vs $426), Ryzen 3 2200G was $327 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 2200G delivers 68.0 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1275 v2 — making the Ryzen 3 2200G the 125.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2200G | Xeon E3-1275 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-77% | $426 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.0+336% | 15.6 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














