Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel

Core i3-9100F

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 2200G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2018
Ryzen family
·······

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 2200G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 2200G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 2200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9100F

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Costs $2 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,704 vs 6,736).

Ryzen 3 2200G

2018

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9100F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 2.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $99 MSRPvs$97 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 2200G better than Core i3-9100F?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-9100F is ahead with a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 2200G pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i3-9100F also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 2200G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 2200G is still the better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 2200G comes in 2.1% more expensive on MSRP at $99 MSRP versus $97 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Core i3-9100F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,704 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 2200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 2200G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-9100F

The Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,704 points. Launch price was $122.

AMD

Ryzen 3 2200G

The Ryzen 3 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,736 points. Launch price was $99.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 2200G share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100F versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200G — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-9100F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2200G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100F scores 6,704 against the Ryzen 3 2200G's 6,736 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 3 2200G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2200G.

FeatureCore i3-9100FRyzen 3 2200G
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+14%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark
6,704
6,736
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-9100FRyzen 3 2200G
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9100F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2200G). Primary use case: Core i3-9100F targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-9100FRyzen 3 2200G
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9100F was priced at $97, while the Ryzen 3 2200G came in at $99. On launch pricing ($97 vs $99), Core i3-9100F was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100F delivers 69.1 pts/$ vs 68.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 2200G — making the Core i3-9100F the 1.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-9100FRyzen 3 2200G
MSRP
$97-2%
$99
Performance per Dollar
69.1+2%
68.0
Release Date
2019
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.