Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen Embedded R2514

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-9100F

4 / 4

6,704

0.0%

6,731

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen Embedded R2514: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9100F

2019

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,704 vs 6,731).
❌Launch MSRP is still $97 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2514 better than Core i3-9100F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-9100F is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2514 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i3-9100F also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 is still the better call for a fresh build. Ryzen Embedded R2514 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $97 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Core i3-9100F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,704 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100F

The Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,704 points. Launch price was $122.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9100F packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded R2514's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100F versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-9100F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100F scores 6,704 against the Ryzen Embedded R2514's 6,731 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2514. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514.

Feature	Core i3-9100F	Ryzen Embedded R2514
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+14%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+71%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	6,704	6,731

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.