PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7835RE vs Core i3-9100F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7835RE vs Core i3-9100F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7835RE

2024

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 12W instead of 65W, a 53W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (32EU), while Core i3-9100F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.5 vs 69.1 PassMark/$ ($127 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).

Core i3-9100F

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.1 vs 53.5 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,704 vs 6,795).
❌441.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7835RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7835RE better than Core i3-9100F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-9100F is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7835RE pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7835RE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7835RE is still the better call for a fresh build. Atom x7835RE comes in 30.9% more expensive on MSRP at $127 MSRP versus $97 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. Core i3-9100F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,704 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7835RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7835RE vs Core i3-9100F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Core i3-9100F

The Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,704 points. Launch price was $122.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-9100F offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100F — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100F (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-9100F uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Core i3-9100F's 6,704 — a 1.3% lead for the Atom x7835RE. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i3-9100F
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.2 GHz+17%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+177%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark	6,795+1%	6,704

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-9100F uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7835RE versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-9100F — the Atom x7835RE supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-9100F supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7835RE) vs 2 (Core i3-9100F). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7835RE) vs 16 (Core i3-9100F) — the Core i3-9100F offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7835RE) and Intel 300 series (Core i3-9100F).

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i3-9100F
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+100%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	9	16+78%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7835RE) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9100F). The Atom x7835RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Core i3-9100F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-9100F targets Desktop.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i3-9100F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom x7835RE was priced at $127, while the Core i3-9100F came in at $97. On launch pricing ($127 vs $97), Core i3-9100F was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x7835RE delivers 53.5 pts/$ vs 69.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-9100F — making the Core i3-9100F the 25.5% better value option.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i3-9100F
MSRP	$127	$97-24%
Performance per Dollar	53.5	69.1+29%
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Atom x7835RE on Amazon

Search Core i3-9100F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.