Atom x7835RE vs Xeon E3-1230 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7835RE vs Xeon E3-1230 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7835RE vs Xeon E3-1230 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7835RE

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 12W instead of 80W, a 68W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (32EU), while Xeon E3-1230 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,795 vs 6,837).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $127 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1230 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1230 v3

2013

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌566.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7835RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1230 v3 better than Atom x7835RE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1230 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom x7835RE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1230 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1230 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1230 v3 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E3-1230 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $127 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom x7835RE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7835RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1150. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7835RE vs Xeon E3-1230 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Xeon E3-1230 v3

The Xeon E3-1230 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,837 points. Launch price was $240.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1230 v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1230 v3 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1230 v3 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E3-1230 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Xeon E3-1230 v3's 6,837 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1230 v3. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1230 v3.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Xeon E3-1230 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+154%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	6,795	6,837

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1230 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Xeon E3-1230 v3
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—