Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 7 2700U

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 7 2700U Performance Spectrum

Atom x7835RE

8 / 8

6,795

0.0%

6,850

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 7 2700U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 7 2700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7835RE

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 12W instead of 15W, a 3W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FP5 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (32EU), while Ryzen 7 2700U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,795 vs 6,850).
❌Launch MSRP is still $127 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 2700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 2700U

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌25% higher power demand at 15W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7835RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 2700U better than Atom x7835RE?

Yes. Ryzen 7 2700U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 2700U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 2700U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 2700U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Ryzen 7 2700U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $127 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom x7835RE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7835RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FP5, and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 7 2700U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Ryzen 7 2700U

The Ryzen 7 2700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 26 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,850 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700U — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700U (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2700U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Ryzen 7 2700U's 6,850 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700U.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 7 2700U
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.8 GHz+6%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.2 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	6,795	6,850

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.