
Atom x7835RE

Core i7-980X
Atom x7835RE vs Core i7-980X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7835RE vs Core i7-980X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7835RE vs Core i7-980X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7835RE
2024Why buy it
- β Costs $872 less on MSRP ($127 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- β Delivers 684.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.5 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($127 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- β Draws 12W instead of 130W, a 118W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1366 and older memory support.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (6,795 vs 6,817).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-980X
2010Why buy it
- β +0.3% higher PassMark.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 53.5 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
- β983.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 12W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1366, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Atom x7835RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-980X better than Atom x7835RE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7835RE vs Core i7-980X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE
The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Core i7-980X
The Core i7-980X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010β2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,817 points. Launch price was $959.
Processing Power
The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-980X offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Atom x7835RE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-980X β identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024β2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-980X uses Gulftown (2010β2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Core i7-980X's 6,817 β a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-980X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Core i7-980X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.33 GHz+156% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024β2025) | Gulftown (2010β2011) |
| PassMark | 6,795 | 6,817 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-980X uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Core i7-980X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 1 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | β |
Advanced Features
The Atom x7835RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Core i7-980X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Core i7-980X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom x7835RE was priced at $127, while the Core i7-980X came in at $999. On launch pricing ($127 vs $999), Atom x7835RE was $872 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x7835RE delivers 53.5 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-980X β making the Atom x7835RE the 154.8% better value option.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Core i7-980X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $127-87% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+687% | 6.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














