Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

CPU

GPU

Atom x7835RE

8 Cores8 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE Performance Spectrum

Atom x7835RE

8 / 8

6,795

0.0%

6,813

+0.3%

Ryzen Embedded R1505G

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7835RE

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 12W instead of 35W, a 23W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,795 vs 6,813).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.5 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($127 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 53.5 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x7835RE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌191.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7835RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7835RE better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x7835RE is ahead with a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Atom x7835RE also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7835RE is still the better call for a fresh build. Atom x7835RE comes in 28.3% more expensive on MSRP at $127 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,813 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7835RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,813 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE's 6,813 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+154%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-17%	12 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	6,795	6,813

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Socket	FCBGA1264	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom x7835RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom x7835RE was priced at $127, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE came in at $99. On launch pricing ($127 vs $99), Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE was $28 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x7835RE delivers 53.5 pts/$ vs 68.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE the 25% better value option.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP	$127	$99-22%
Performance per Dollar	53.5	68.8+29%
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Atom x7835RE on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.