Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Performance Spectrum

Core i3-9100F

4 / 4

6,704

+0.6%

6,661

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9100F

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $197 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 205.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.1 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9100F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,661 vs 6,704).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 69.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9100F better than Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G?

Yes. Core i3-9100F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-9100F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9100F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-9100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-9100F comes in $197 cheaper on MSRP at $97 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 205.0% better value on MSRP (69.1 vs 22.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100F

The Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,704 points. Launch price was $122.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,661 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100F versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100F. The Core i3-9100F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100F scores 6,704 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G's 6,661 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-9100F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100F vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.

Feature	Core i3-9100F	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+20%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	6,704	6,661

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9100F	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9100F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G). Primary use case: Core i3-9100F targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-9100F	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9100F was priced at $97, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G came in at $294. On launch pricing ($97 vs $294), Core i3-9100F was $197 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100F delivers 69.1 pts/$ vs 22.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G — making the Core i3-9100F the 101.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9100F	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
MSRP	$97-67%	$294
Performance per Dollar	69.1+204%	22.7
Release Date	2019	2018

Search Core i3-9100F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.