
Core i3-9100F

Opteron 6380
Core i3-9100F vs Opteron 6380 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-9100F vs Opteron 6380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-9100F vs Opteron 6380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-9100F
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $454 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 469.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.1 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6380, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6380
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,687 vs 6,704).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 69.1 PassMark/$ ($551 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-9100F better than Opteron 6380?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100F vs Opteron 6380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100F
The Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,704 points. Launch price was $122.

Opteron 6380
The Opteron 6380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,687 points. Launch price was $1,150.
Processing Power
The Core i3-9100F packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6380 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6380 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100F versus 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6380 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-9100F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6380 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100F scores 6,704 against the Opteron 6380's 6,687 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-9100F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100F vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6380.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | Opteron 6380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+24% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+1500% | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 6,704 | 6,687 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9100F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6380 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | Opteron 6380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9100F) / not specified (Opteron 6380). Primary use case: Core i3-9100F targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | Opteron 6380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-9100F was priced at $97, while the Opteron 6380 came in at $551. On launch pricing ($97 vs $551), Core i3-9100F was $454 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100F delivers 69.1 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Opteron 6380 — making the Core i3-9100F the 140.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | Opteron 6380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $97-82% | $551 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.1+471% | 12.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















