Ryzen 3 3300U
VS
Atom C3808

Ryzen 3 3300U vs Atom C3808

AMD

Ryzen 3 3300U

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Atom C3808

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen 3 3300U is positioned at rank 586 and the Atom C3808 is on rank 737, so the Ryzen 3 3300U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 3300U

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#574
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
774%
#575
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
763%
#576
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
700%
#577
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
697%
#578
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
691%
#580
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
667%
#581
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
639%
#582
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
638%
#583
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
621%
#586
Ryzen 3 3300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3808

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14472%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2733%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2428%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1875%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
100%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
96%
#736
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#737
Atom C3808
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#746
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#747
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#749
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 3 3300U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom C3808 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 3 3300UAtom C3808
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 3 3300UAtom C3808
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3300U and Atom C3808

AMD

Ryzen 3 3300U

The Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,686 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3808 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3300U versus 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3300U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3300U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Atom C3808 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3300U scores 5,686 against the Atom C3808's 5,671 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 3300U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3300U vs 12 MB on the Atom C3808.

FeatureRyzen 3 3300UAtom C3808
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+75%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+5%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
12 MB+200%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
12 MB+2300%
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
5,686
5,671
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3808 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 3300UAtom C3808
Socket
FP5
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12