Ryzen 3 4100 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4

AMD

Ryzen 3 4100

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2022
Ryzen family
······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2643 v4

6 Cores12 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 3 4100 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 4100 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 4100 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 4100

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,453 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1473.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.7 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2643 v4, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E5-2643 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +149.9% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (11,024 vs 11,062).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 111.7 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 4100 better than Xeon E5-2643 v4?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2643 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 4100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 4100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 4100 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 4100 comes in $1,453 cheaper on MSRP at $99 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1473.1% better value on MSRP (111.7 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 4100 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 3 4100

The Ryzen 3 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 11,062 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2643 v4

The Xeon E5-2643 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,024 points. Launch price was $1,552.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 4100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2643 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4100 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v4 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 4100 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 4100 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4100 scores 11,062 against the Xeon E5-2643 v4's 11,024 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 4100. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4100 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2643 v4.

FeatureRyzen 3 4100Xeon E5-2643 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+8%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+12%
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8.00391 MB (total)
20 MB+150%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+34033%
1.5 MB
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Renoir (2020−2023)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
11,062
11,024
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 4100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 4100Xeon E5-2643 v4
Socket
AM4
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 4100 was priced at $99, while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($99 vs $1552), Ryzen 3 4100 was $1453 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 4100 delivers 111.7 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2643 v4 — making the Ryzen 3 4100 the 176.1% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 4100Xeon E5-2643 v4
MSRP
$99-94%
$1552
Performance per Dollar
111.7+1473%
7.1
Release Date
2022
2016

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.