Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Xeon E3-1220 v6

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1220 v6

4 Cores4 Thrd72 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Xeon E3-1220 v6 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Xeon E3-1220 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Xeon E3-1220 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $263 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $372 MSRP).
  • Delivers 242.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $372 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 72W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E3-1220 v6

2017

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (5,589 vs 5,609).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($372 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 better than Xeon E3-1220 v6?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 comes in $263 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $372 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 242.5% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 15.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Xeon E3-1220 v6 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

    The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Xeon E3-1220 v6

    The Xeon E3-1220 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,589 points. Launch price was $193.

    Processing Power

    Both the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon E3-1220 v6 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v6 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220 v6 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 scores 5,609 against the Xeon E3-1220 v6's 5,589 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1220 v6.

    FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1200Xeon E3-1220 v6
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.4 GHz
    3.5 GHz+3%
    Base Clock
    3.1 GHz+3%
    3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)
    8 MB
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)+51100%
    1 MB
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Zen (2017−2020)
    Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
    PassMark
    5,609
    5,589
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1200Xeon E3-1220 v6
    Socket
    AM4
    LGA1151
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 was priced at $109, while the Xeon E3-1220 v6 came in at $372. On launch pricing ($109 vs $372), Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 was $263 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 15.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220 v6 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 the 109.6% better value option.

    FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1200Xeon E3-1220 v6
    MSRP
    $109-71%
    $372
    Performance per Dollar
    51.5+243%
    15.0
    Release Date
    2017
    2017

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.