Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
VS
Xeon E3-1280

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Xeon E3-1280

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1280

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is positioned at rank 255 and the Xeon E3-1280 is on rank 517, so the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4039%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
763%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
677%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
523%
#218
Xeon Gold 5512U
MSRP: $1230|Avg: N/A
98%
#219
Xeon D-1733NT
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#220
Xeon 6520P
MSRP: $1295|Avg: $1295
96%
#255
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $80
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1280

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7406%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1398%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1242%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
960%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
99%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
99%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
99%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
98%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
98%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
95%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
95%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
94%
#517
Xeon E3-1280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 1200Xeon E3-1280
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3-1280 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 1200Xeon E3-1280
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon E3-1280

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E3-1280

The Xeon E3-1280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,612 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1280's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1280 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 scores 5,609 against the Xeon E3-1280's 5,612 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1280. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1200Xeon E3-1280
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz+15%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
5,609
5,612
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1280 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 1200Xeon E3-1280
Socket
AM4
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0