Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Performance Spectrum

Atom C3808

12 / 12

5,671

+1.1%

5,609

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3808

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3808 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,609 vs 5,671).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Atom C3808 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3808 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 1200?

Yes. Atom C3808 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom C3808 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3808 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3808 is still the better call for a fresh build. Atom C3808 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 5,609 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3808 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Atom C3808 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3808 scores 5,671 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 5,609 — a 1.1% lead for the Atom C3808. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3808 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200.

Feature	Atom C3808	Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.4 GHz+70%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.1 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	12 MB+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB	512K (per core)+4167%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	5,671+1%	5,609

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3808 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.