Atom C3808 vs Core i5-7440EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3808 vs Core i5-7440EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3808 vs Core i5-7440EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3808

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,671 vs 5,711).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7440EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-7440EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Atom C3808 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3808 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Atom C3808 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7440EQ better than Atom C3808?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom C3808 is ahead with a 28.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7440EQ pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Atom C3808 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7440EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7440EQ is the better buy right now. Core i5-7440EQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $250 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Atom C3808 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7440EQ is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Atom C3808 vs Core i5-7440EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Core i5-7440EQ

The Core i5-7440EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,711 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3808 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-7440EQ offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-7440EQ — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-7440EQ. The Atom C3808 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7440EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3808 scores 5,671 against the Core i5-7440EQ's 5,711 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-7440EQ. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3808 vs 6 MB on the Core i5-7440EQ.

Feature	Atom C3808	Core i5-7440EQ
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB+100%	6 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB+1100%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,671	5,711
Geekbench 6 Single	—	892
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,937

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3808 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7440EQ — the Core i5-7440EQ supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3808 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3808) vs 16 (Core i5-7440EQ) — the Core i5-7440EQ offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3808) and 100-series,CM230 (Core i5-7440EQ).

Feature	Atom C3808	Core i5-7440EQ
Socket	FCBGA1310	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+300%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3808) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7440EQ). The Core i5-7440EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Atom C3808 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7440EQ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-7440EQ rivals Ryzen Embedded V1605B.