Atom C3808
VS
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Intel

Atom C3808

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom C3808 is positioned at rank #737 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3808

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14472%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2733%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2428%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1875%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
100%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
96%
#736
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#737
Atom C3808
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#746
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#747
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#749
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom C3808 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom C3808Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom C3808Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Intel

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,639 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom C3808 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom C3808 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3808 scores 5,671 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U's 5,639 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom C3808. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3808 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

FeatureAtom C3808Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+200%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.4 GHz+70%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB+200%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB+2300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark
5,671
5,639
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3808 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom C3808Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Socket
FCBGA1310
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12