Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U Performance Spectrum

Atom C3808

12 / 12

5,671

+0.6%

5,639

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3808

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3808 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,639 vs 5,671).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3808 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U?

Yes. Atom C3808 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 31.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom C3808 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3808 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3808 still makes the most sense overall. Atom C3808 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,639 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3808 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom C3808 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3808 scores 5,671 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U's 5,639 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom C3808. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3808 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

Feature	Atom C3808	Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.4 GHz+70%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB+2300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	5,671	5,639

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3808 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.