Atom C3808
VS
Core i5-4690K

Atom C3808 vs Core i5-4690K

Intel

Atom C3808

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-4690K

4 Cores4 Thrd88 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3808 is positioned at rank 737 and the Core i5-4690K is on rank 718, so the Core i5-4690K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3808

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14472%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2733%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2428%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1875%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
100%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
96%
#736
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#737
Atom C3808
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#746
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#747
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#749
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4690K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13315%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12582%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9135%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2752%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2180%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1907%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1092%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1078%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
982%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
981%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
970%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
944%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
931%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
927%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
919%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
100%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
100%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
100%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
99%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
99%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
99%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
98%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
98%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
98%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
98%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
97%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3808 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3808Core i5-4690K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($101)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4690K (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3808Core i5-4690K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($101)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3808 and Core i5-4690K

Intel

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Intel

Core i5-4690K

The Core i5-4690K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 88 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,689 points. Launch price was $300.

Processing Power

The Atom C3808 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-4690K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-4690K — a 64.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4690K (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Atom C3808 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4690K uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3808 scores 5,671 against the Core i5-4690K's 5,689 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4690K. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3808 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4690K.

FeatureAtom C3808Core i5-4690K
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+200%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.9 GHz+95%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
12 MB+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB+4700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,671
5,689
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3808 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4690K uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3808 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4690K — the Atom C3808 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3808 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3808) vs 16 (Core i5-4690K) — the Core i5-4690K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom C3808Core i5-4690K
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+700%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3808) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4690K). The Core i5-4690K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Atom C3808 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4690K targets Desktop.

FeatureAtom C3808Core i5-4690K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop