
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE

Xeon E5-4627 v4
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Xeon E5-4627 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,320 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1266.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 70.9 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($180 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,761 vs 12,969).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4627 v4, which brings 10 cores / 10 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-4627 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 10 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 70.9 PassMark/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE better than Xeon E5-4627 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,761 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4627 v4
The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,969 points. Launch price was $2,225.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Xeon E5-4627 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scores 12,761 against the Xeon E5-4627 v4's 12,969 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4627 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4627 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE | Xeon E5-4627 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 10+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+31% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 25 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2.5 MB+400% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 12,761 | 12,969+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,105 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,936 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE | Xeon E5-4627 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE) / Yes (Xeon E5-4627 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE | Xeon E5-4627 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE was priced at $180, while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 came in at $2500. On launch pricing ($180 vs $2500), Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE was $2320 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE delivers 70.9 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE the 172.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE | Xeon E5-4627 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180-93% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 70.9+1263% | 5.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













