Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

4 / 8

11,059

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 / 16

11,055

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Xeon E5-2640 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

2022

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 90W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,055 vs 11,059).
❌Launch MSRP is still $939 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌500% higher power demand at 90W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U better than Xeon E5-2640 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2640 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2640 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $939 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2640 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2640 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,059 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U uses the Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U scores 11,059 against the Xeon E5-2640 v3's 11,055 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+21%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+4%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	11,059	11,055

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.