Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U Performance Spectrum

Core 7 160UL

10 / 12

11,043

0.0%

11,059

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 160UL

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 11,059).

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U better than Core 7 160UL?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 7 160UL is ahead with a 18.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core 7 160UL also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 7 160UL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,059 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U uses Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U's 11,059 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U.

Feature	Core 7 160UL	Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
Cores / Threads	10 / 12+150%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+27%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm	7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-PS (2024)	Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022)
PassMark	11,043	11,059

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.