Core 7 160UL
VS
Xeon E5-2640 v3

Core 7 160UL vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 Cores16 Thrd90 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2640 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17657%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3334%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2962%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2288%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
100%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
100%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
98%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
97%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
97%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
96%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
100%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
99%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core 7 160UL (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 7 160ULXeon E5-2640 v3
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-PS (2024) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 7 160ULXeon E5-2640 v3
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and Xeon E5-2640 v3

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v3

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — a 41.9% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Xeon E5-2640 v3's 11,055 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3.

FeatureCore 7 160ULXeon E5-2640 v3
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+53%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
11,043
11,055
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 160ULXeon E5-2640 v3
Socket
LGA1700
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 160UL) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server.

FeatureCore 7 160ULXeon E5-2640 v3
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server