
Core 7 160UL

Ryzen 3 4300GE
Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 4300GE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 4300GE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 4300GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 7 160UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 11,239).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 4300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 4300GE.
Ryzen 3 4300GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Core 7 160UL needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 7 160UL.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $94 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 7 160UL better than Ryzen 3 4300GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 4300GE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 160UL
The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 4300GE
The Ryzen 3 4300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 11,239 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 4300GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4300GE — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 4300GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Ryzen 3 4300GE's 11,239 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 4300GE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4300GE.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+30% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+94% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 11,043 | 11,239+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,472 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,063 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 4300GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 160UL) / Yes (Ryzen 3 4300GE). The Ryzen 3 4300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Core 7 160UL requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 6 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














