Core 7 160UL
VS
Ryzen 3 5400U

Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 5400U

Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 5400U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 5400U

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
99%
#375
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
533%
#376
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
526%
#377
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
482%
#378
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
480%
#379
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
476%
#381
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
460%
#382
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
441%
#383
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
440%
#384
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
428%
#387
Ryzen 3 5400U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#391
Core i5-1145GRE
MSRP: $362|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 7 160UL delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 3 5400U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 5400U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-PS (2024) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 5400U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and Ryzen 3 5400U

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 5400U

The Ryzen 3 5400U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,002 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 5400U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 5400U — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 5400U uses Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Ryzen 3 5400U's 11,002 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 7 160UL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 5400U.

FeatureCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 5400U
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+150%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+30%
4 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm
7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
11,043
11,002
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 5400U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 5400U
Socket
LGA1700
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0