
Core 7 160UL

Core i5-10500H
Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 7 160UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌900% higher power demand at 15W vs 1.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10500H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core 7 160UL needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,970 vs 11,043).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 7 160UL better than Core i5-10500H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 160UL
The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-10500H
The Core i5-10500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 153 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,970 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-10500H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10500H — a 14.4% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-10500H uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Core i5-10500H's 10,970 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 7 160UL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 12 MB on the Core i5-10500H.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Core i5-10500H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+16% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+737% | 153 kB |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 11,043 | 10,970 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,435 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10500H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Core i5-10500H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 160UL) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10500H). The Core i5-10500H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core 7 160UL requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10500H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10500H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Core i5-10500H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














