Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H

Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-10500H

6 Cores12 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2020
Core family
·······

Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 160UL

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • 900% higher power demand at 15W vs 1.5W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-10500H

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core 7 160UL needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (10,970 vs 11,043).
  • Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 160UL better than Core i5-10500H?
Yes. Core 7 160UL is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core 7 160UL is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 7 160UL is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 7 160UL still makes the most sense overall. Core 7 160UL comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 160UL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 160UL vs Core i5-10500H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-10500H

The Core i5-10500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 153 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,970 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-10500H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10500H — a 14.4% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-10500H uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Core i5-10500H's 10,970 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 7 160UL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 12 MB on the Core i5-10500H.

FeatureCore 7 160ULCore i5-10500H
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+16%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz+39%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+737%
153 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark
11,043
10,970
Geekbench 6 Single
1,435
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10500H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 160ULCore i5-10500H
Socket
LGA1700
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 160UL) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10500H). The Core i5-10500H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core 7 160UL requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10500H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10500H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.

FeatureCore 7 160ULCore i5-10500H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Performance Laptop