Core 7 160UL
VS
EPYC 7261

Core 7 160UL vs EPYC 7261

Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024
VS
AMD

EPYC 7261

8 Cores16 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7261

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9340%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1764%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1567%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1210%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
99%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
98%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
97%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
97%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
97%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
96%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
96%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
100%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#605
Xeon E3-1270 v3
MSRP: $339|Avg: $410
96%
#607
Xeon E3-1235
MSRP: $240|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core 7 160UL (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 7 160ULEPYC 7261
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-PS (2024) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7261 (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 7 160ULEPYC 7261
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and EPYC 7261

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

EPYC 7261

The EPYC 7261 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,149 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7261 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7261 — a 56.8% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7261 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the EPYC 7261's 11,149 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7261. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7261.

FeatureCore 7 160ULEPYC 7261
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+79%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz+39%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
11,043
11,149
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7261 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 160ULEPYC 7261
Socket
LGA1700
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0