
Ryzen 5 230

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Ryzen 5 230 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 230 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 230 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 230
2025Why buy it
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Costs $109 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- β Delivers 54.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- β Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (20,186 vs 20,227).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- β +0.2% higher PassMark.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 5 230 needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 230.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 65.5 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 230 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 230 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 230 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 230
The Ryzen 5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,186 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 230 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 230 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G β a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 230 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 230 uses the Hawk Point (2024β2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses Renoir (2020β2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 230 scores 20,186 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 20,227 β a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 230 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024β2025) | Renoir (2020β2023) |
| PassMark | 20,186 | 20,227 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 12,814 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,627 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 7,556 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 230 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 230) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Ryzen 5 230 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 230 was priced at $200, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G came in at $309. On launch pricing ($200 vs $309), Ryzen 5 230 was $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 230 delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 65.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G β making the Ryzen 5 230 the 42.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-35% | $309 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9+54% | 65.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













