Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 5 230

Intel

Core i5-13400T

10 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 230

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 5 230 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 5 230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 5 230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen 5 230 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 5 230.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 230 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.7 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.

Ryzen 5 230

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $21 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
  • Delivers 10.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
  • Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,186 vs 20,265).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 230 better than Core i5-13400T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 230 is ahead with a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i5-13400T also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 230 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 230 comes in $21 cheaper on MSRP at $200 MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-13400T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 10.1% better value on MSRP (100.9 vs 91.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 230 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 5 230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

AMD

Ryzen 5 230

The Ryzen 5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,186 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 230 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 230 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 230 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 230 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Ryzen 5 230's 20,186 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-13400T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 230.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 5 230
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.5 GHz+169%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
20,265
20,186
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,094
Geekbench 6 Single
2,364
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,135
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 230 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 5 230
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 230). The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Ryzen 5 230 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 5 230
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Energy Efficient Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400T was priced at $221, while the Ryzen 5 230 came in at $200. On launch pricing ($221 vs $200), Ryzen 5 230 was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400T delivers 91.7 pts/$ vs 100.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 230 — making the Ryzen 5 230 the 9.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 5 230
MSRP
$221
$200-10%
Performance per Dollar
91.7
100.9+10%
Release Date
2023
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.