Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400T

10 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2020

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400T

10 / 16

20,265

+0.2%

20,227

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅+25.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $88 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.7 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,814 vs 16,094).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.5 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400T better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is ahead with a 10.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T pulls ahead with 25.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13400T also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 25.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400T comes in $88 cheaper on MSRP at $221 MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it still gives you 25.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.1% better value on MSRP (91.7 vs 65.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 20,227 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-13400T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,094 vs 12,814 (22.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,364 vs 1,627, a 36.9% lead for the Core i5-13400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,135 vs 7,556 (38.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+177%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+150%	8 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	20,265	20,227
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,094+26%	12,814
Geekbench 6 Single	2,364+45%	1,627
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,135+47%	7,556

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — the Core i5-13400T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400T) vs 16 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — the Core i5-13400T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690 (Core i5-13400T) and Socket AM4 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G).

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Core i5-13400T) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 730	Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Energy Efficient Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400T was priced at $221, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G came in at $309. On launch pricing ($221 vs $309), Core i5-13400T was $88 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400T delivers 91.7 pts/$ vs 65.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — making the Core i5-13400T the 33.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP	$221-28%	$309
Performance per Dollar	91.7+40%	65.5
Release Date	2023	2020

Search Core i5-13400T on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.