
Core i5-13400T

Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,265).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400T better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400T
The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.


Ryzen Embedded V3C48
The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-13400T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+154% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 20,265 | 20,203 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,094 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,364 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,135 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Energy Efficient Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













