PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400T vs Core Ultra 9 288V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400T vs Core Ultra 9 288V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅+73.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $379 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 171.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.7 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 288V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 30W.

Core Ultra 9 288V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 30W instead of 35W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,300 vs 16,094).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 288V better than Core i5-13400T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 9 288V is ahead with a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T pulls ahead with 73.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13400T also has the bigger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 73.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 9 288V is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 9 288V comes in 171.5% more expensive on MSRP at $600 MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-13400T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 73.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13400T is also 171.3% better value on MSRP (91.7 vs 33.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 288V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400T vs Core Ultra 9 288V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

Core Ultra 9 288V

The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 288V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Core Ultra 9 288V's 20,280 — a 0.1% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,094 vs 9,300 (53.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,364 vs 2,800, a 16.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,135 vs 10,000 (10.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Core Ultra 9 288V
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+154%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+67%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2.5 MB (per core)+100%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark	20,265	20,280
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,094+73%	9,300
Geekbench 6 Single	2,364	2,800+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,135+11%	10,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400T versus LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 9 288V — the Core Ultra 9 288V supports 77.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400T) vs 8 (Core Ultra 9 288V) — the Core i5-13400T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690 (Core i5-13400T) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 288V).

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Core Ultra 9 288V
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	LPDDR5X-8533+78%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+500%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20+150%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) vs true (Core Ultra 9 288V). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Core i5-13400T) and Intel Arc 140V (Core Ultra 9 288V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Core Ultra 9 288V
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 730	Intel Arc 140V
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Energy Efficient Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400T was priced at $221, while the Core Ultra 9 288V came in at $600. On launch pricing ($221 vs $600), Core i5-13400T was $379 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400T delivers 91.7 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 288V — making the Core i5-13400T the 92.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP	$221-63%	$600
Performance per Dollar	91.7+171%	33.8
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i5-13400T on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 9 288V on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.