CPU
GPU
Core i5-13400T
Core Ultra 9 288V
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400T
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 288V
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13400T | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($600) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13400T | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+200%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($600) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400T and Core Ultra 9 288V
Core i5-13400T
The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.
Core Ultra 9 288V
The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 288V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Core Ultra 9 288V's 20,280 — a 0.1% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,094 vs 9,300 (53.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,364 vs 2,800, a 16.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,135 vs 10,000 (10.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+154% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+67% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 20,265 | 20,280 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,094+73% | 9,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,364 | 2,800+18% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,135+11% | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400T) vs 8 (Core Ultra 9 288V) — the Core i5-13400T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690 (Core i5-13400T) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 288V).
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+500% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) vs true (Core Ultra 9 288V). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Core i5-13400T) and Intel Arc 140V (Core Ultra 9 288V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Arc 140V |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Energy Efficient Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400T launched at $221 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 9 288V debuted at $600. At current prices ($200 vs $600), the Core i5-13400T is $400 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400T delivers 101.3 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 288V — making the Core i5-13400T the 99.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221-63% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-67% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 101.3+200% | 33.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13400T and Core Ultra 9 288V
