Core i5-13400T vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400T vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400T vs Xeon E5-4667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Xeon E5-4667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,265 vs 20,319).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4667 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400T better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $221 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4667 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (91.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400T vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	18 / 36+80%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+47%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.2 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	45 MB+125%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4.5 MB+260%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	20,265	20,319
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,094	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,364	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,135	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v4). The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.