Core i5-13400T vs EPYC 8024P

Core i5-13400T vs EPYC 8024P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400T

10 / 16

20,265

0.0%

20,455

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400T vs EPYC 8024P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400T vs EPYC 8024P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike EPYC 8024P.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,265 vs 20,455).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while EPYC 8024P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400T better than EPYC 8024P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8024P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8024P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $221 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 8024P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (91.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-13400T vs EPYC 8024P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 8024P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 8024P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the EPYC 8024P's 20,455 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	EPYC 8024P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+47%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	20,265	20,455
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,094	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,364	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,135	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 8024P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	EPYC 8024P
Socket	LGA1700	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) / not specified (EPYC 8024P). The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.